Corpus record OMC_0015

SABR-COMET randomized phase 2 trial: stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR/SBRT) to all oligometastases plus standard palliative care versus standard palliative care alone in oligometastatic cancer

Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, Gaede S, Louie AV, Haasbeek C, Mulroy L, Lock M, Rodrigues GB, Yaremko BP, Schellenberg D, Ahmad B, Griffioen G, Senthi S, Swaminath A, Kopek N, Liu M, Moore K, Currie S, Bauman GS, Warner A, Senan S

Abstract

Background: The oligometastatic cancer paradigm proposes that selected patients with a limited number of metastatic lesions might be cured if all sites of disease are eradicated. Randomized controlled trial evidence supporting this metastasis-directed approach is scarce. We assessed the effect of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR; stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT) on overall survival, oncological outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life in patients with a controlled primary tumour and one to five oligometastatic lesions. Methods: This randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial was conducted at 10 hospitals in Canada, the Netherlands, Scotland, and Australia. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a controlled primary tumour, one to five metastatic lesions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and a life expectancy of at least 6 months. After stratification by number of metastases (1-3 vs 4-5), patients were randomly assigned (1:2) to palliative standard-of-care treatment alone (control group) or standard of care plus SABR to all metastatic lesions (SABR group), using a computer-generated randomisation list with permuted blocks of nine. Patients and physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A randomized phase 2 screening design was used with a two-sided alpha of 0.20, in which p<0.20 designated a positive trial. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01446744. Findings: Between Feb 10, 2012, and Aug 30, 2016, 99 patients were randomized: 33 (33%) to the control group and 66 (67%) to the SABR group. In the SABR group, two (3%) patients did not receive allocated treatment and withdrew; in the control group, two (6%) patients withdrew. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 19-54) in the control group and 26 months (23-37) in the SABR group. Median overall survival was 28 months (95% CI 19-33) with standard palliative care alone versus 41 months (26-not reached) with standard care plus SABR to all metastases (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.30-1.10; p=0.090). Grade 2 or worse adverse events occurred in three (9%) of 33 controls and 19 (29%) of 66 patients in the SABR group (p=0.026), an absolute increase of 20% (95% CI 5-34). Treatment-related deaths occurred in three (4.5%) of 66 patients after SABR and in none in the control group. Interpretation: Adding comprehensive SABR to standard palliative treatment was associated with improved overall survival and met the primary endpoint of this randomized phase 2 trial, but three (4.5%) of 66 patients assigned to SABR had treatment-related death. Phase 3 trials are needed to conclusively establish an overall survival benefit and to determine the maximum number of metastatic lesions for which SABR provides benefit. Funding: Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and London Regional Cancer Program Catalyst Grant.